Trump Presses to Complete the Gaza Peace Plan

* Trump is pressing for key decisions and announcements that he believes will counter a perception that his Gaza peace plan is failing.
* Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will likely continue to resist U.S. pressure to withdraw from additional areas of Gaza when he meets with Trump at Mar-a-Lago at the end of the month.
* U.S. officials assess that extensive U.S. involvement in implementing the peace plan will give regional leaders the confidence to provide personnel to the International Stabilization Force (ISF), which is to secure post-war Gaza.
* To encourage regional and global leaders to contribute forces to the ISF, Trump plans to appoint a senior U.S. military leader as the force’s nominal commander, and the U.S. military will hold a conference on Tuesday to brief potential donor countries on the scope of the ISF’s mission.

It has been two months since President Donald Trump and regional leaders signed his 20 Point Plan for Gaza peace in Sharm el-Sheikh, and one month since the plan was endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2803. But implementation has not advanced beyond its “Phase One” provisions — a release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, a ceasefire, and a partial Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. The ceasefire remains relatively intact since it took effect on October 10, although regional officials have cited U.S. officials for “green-lighting” — or at least overlooking — continued Israeli attacks on Hamas militants throughout the enclave. On Saturday, an Israeli strike killed a senior leader of Hamas’ military wing (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-october-17/) , Raed Saad, who Israel claimed was spearheading Hamas rearmament. Human rights groups have accused Israel of failing to uphold its commitments to increase the flow of humanitarian aid and essential supplies,
such as tents, into the Strip.

Nor has the politico-military complexion of Gaza unfolded as the Trump peace plan envisions. Israeli forces remain in control of about half of Gaza — areas which only a small percentage of the population inhabits. Global officials report that Hamas has largely reasserted political and security control in the areas of Gaza evacuated by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), including Gaza City. In early December, one of Hamas’ top political leaders, Khalid Meshaal, publicly restated the group’s position that it will not agree to disarm voluntarily, even though disarmament is a core feature of the Trump plan. Last week, the Chief of the IDF General Staff, Eyal Zamir, said Israel would not yield its current military positions in Gaza, including agricultural land and the border crossing with Egypt, essentially establishing a “new border” with Gaza. The statement seemed to signal a hardening of Israel’s position and suggested that U.S. officials are having difficulty securing Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu’s (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-august-1/) full cooperation on the postwar components of the peace plan. The Israeli position on withdrawal might fuel tensions when Netanyahu and Trump meet again on December 29 at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago compound in South Florida.

The Hamas and Israeli statements, coupled with a lack of movement on postwar arrangements, have prompted Trump to force key decisions in order to counter a perception that his plan is stalled or failing outright. Trump and his team plan to announce, by early 2026, a series of appointments crucial to fully implementing the Gaza roadmap as designed. Trump’s team calculates that advancing the plan requires extensive direct U.S. involvement in all aspects of the Gaza peace process. Yet a perception of extensive U.S. control risks alienating U.S. partners in Europe, the Arab and Muslim world, including the Palestinians — all of which demand input into the plan’s implementation. A failure to incorporate significant buy-in, particularly from the region, risks the collapse of the Trump plan, a restart of the Israel-Hamas conflict (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-october-6/) , and a Gaza population facing squalid conditions and widespread destruction indefinitely.

During their upcoming meeting, Trump is likely to urge Netanyahu to cooperate with his efforts to move into Phase II of the plan, which outlines postwar security and governance arrangements. To govern Gaza on an interim basis, a committee of approximately a dozen Palestinian technocrats, who are not affiliated with Hamas, is to be appointed. The governing body would be supervised by an international “Board of Peace,” nominally led by Trump himself. Phase II envisions an International Stabilization Force (ISF) (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-december-1/) deploying to secure Gaza on an interim basis. As the ISF deploys and Hamas disarms, as required under the plan, Israel is to complete its withdrawal to the prior Israel-Gaza border. However, neither the Board nor the technocratic governing committee has been established. Several countries have said they are considering providing forces to the ISF, but no troop commitments have been affirmed to date. The lack of progress on the
postwar elements of the plan has prompted Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders to argue that Israel cannot implement its commitments under Phase II unless all parts of Trump’s plan, which guarantee Israel’s long-term security, are fully agreed and implemented.

To instill momentum in the process, U.S. officials are reportedly working to advance two lines of effort ahead of the Netanyahu visit later this month — establishing the Board of Peace and securing personnel contributions to the ISF. Trump told reporters on Wednesday he plans to fill out the membership of the Board of Peace in the first weeks of 2026 — a delay from the initial plan to establish the body before the Christmas holiday. He is expected to name his top advisers, such as Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner, as members of an “international executive board” of the body. Global figures such as former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair are expected to be named as well. It is not clear that U.S. officials will respond to Palestinian appeals to include Palestinian figures. On Thursday, U.S. officials proposed that Nickolay Mladenov, a Bulgarian diplomat and former UN Middle East envoy, be appointed as the Board’s on-the-ground representative in Gaza.
In such a role, Mladenov would supervise a future Palestinian technocratic government, which is to run the enclave until the West Bank-Palestinian Authority (PA) (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2023-november-7/) has undergone sufficient reform to take over Gaza governance. Mladenov currently runs the diplomatic academy in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and regional sources say UAE leaders urged the Trump team to nominate him for the Gaza post — perhaps in return for a UAE contribution to the ISF.

However, even if Board appointments are filled out, experts note U.S. officials have offered little clarity on how the Board and the interim Palestinian governing committee would actually govern Gaza — or, more consequentially, how it can operate while armed Hamas terrorists remain in control of much of the enclave. Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, questioned the lack of clarity in comments to journalists, asking: “Is [the Board of Peace] the overriding executive authority that has the final say in Palestinian governance and security? If that’s the case, it’s going to fail because none of these members of the Board of Peace have the time or inclination to make those decisions.”

Trump and his team are also planning to announce decisions aimed at encouraging regional leaders to pledge military personnel to the ISF. Potential force donors (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-october-27/) , including Azerbaijan, Indonesia, Türkiye, and Egypt, initially told U.S. officials they would provide forces, but later hesitated as Hamas leaders insisted the group would not disarm. Potential donors have noted that Resolution 2803 provides a UN mandate for the ISF, but leaders of troop-contributing countries envision their personnel as peacekeeping police forces — not combat units. Leaders of Arab and Muslim states, in particular, are unwilling to risk the optics and political backlash that would result if their forces are seen to be fighting armed Palestinians in Gaza — combat that would inevitably also result in additional Palestinian civilian casualties.

Trump’s appointment of a U.S. military leader to head the Civil Military Coordination Center (CMCC) (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-november-17/) , the body that monitors the ceasefire and coordinates humanitarian aid, has not provided regional leaders enough confidence to confirm troop donations to the ISF. To try to address their remaining concerns, Trump is reportedly planning to appoint an American two-star general to command the ISF in Gaza, according to U.S. and Israeli officials. The appointment is intended to message potential ISF troop donors that the U.S. is assuming significant responsibility for securing and rebuilding Gaza. But the message is clouded by repeated U.S. assertions that no U.S. “boots” will be on the ground in Gaza itself — a restriction that would seemingly prevent the U.S. from backstopping the ISF in the event of a combat challenge. During his visit to the region last week, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Michael Waltz stressed to Israeli
officials that having an American general in charge of the ISF should give Israel confidence that the force will operate according to appropriate standards.

As part of its effort to line up ISF troop contributions, two U.S. officials told journalists, on background, that on Tuesday, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-october-14/) will host a conference in Doha with partner forces to plan the ISF mission in Gaza. More than 25 countries are expected to send representatives to the conference, which will include sessions on the command structure and other issues related to the Gaza force. To encourage force contributions, U.S. officials have exerted pressure on their European and regional counterparts, arguing that if their countries refuse to send soldiers to the ISF, the Israeli military will not withdraw from the areas of Gaza it still occupies. A European diplomat characterized the U.S. presentations as follows: “The message was: ‘If you are not ready to go to Gaza, don’t complain that the IDF stays.’”

https://x.com/TheSoufanCenter

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *